Scope and authorization document
Written agreement on targets, timing, methods and exclusions, signed before any testing begins.
Other Services
A structured review of IT controls and a technical vulnerability assessment of your external and internal footprint, with findings ranked by real risk.
This combines an IT controls review with a technical vulnerability assessment. The controls review looks at access management, change control, backup and recovery, asset management, logging and vendor oversight. The technical assessment scans your external and internal footprint for known vulnerabilities, weak configuration and exposed services.
Findings are ranked by exploitability and business impact together, not by scanner severity alone. A critical-rated finding on an isolated test box matters less than a medium-rated one on an internet-facing system holding customer data, and the report should say so.
To be clear about scope: this is a vulnerability assessment, not a penetration test. We identify and verify weaknesses; we do not attempt to exploit them to establish a foothold. If you need a penetration test or a formal certification audit, we will tell you and point you toward a specialist.
The deliverables below are the default scope. We adjust them to your situation during scoping and confirm the final list in writing.
Written agreement on targets, timing, methods and exclusions, signed before any testing begins.
What exists and what is reachable, including assets nobody had on a list.
Each finding with evidence, affected assets, exploitability, business impact and remediation guidance.
Access management, change control, backup and recovery, asset management, logging and vendor oversight.
Immediate actions, near-term fixes and structural improvements, with effort indications.
A non-technical summary suitable for a leadership team or board.
Indicative timings for a typical engagement of this type. Your scope, environment and availability of stakeholders will move them.
Define targets and rules of engagement in writing. Nothing is tested without written authorization.
External and internal asset discovery to establish what is actually exposed.
Authenticated and unauthenticated scanning, configuration review, and manual validation to remove false positives.
Interviews and document review against the control areas in scope.
Findings register, remediation plan and sessions for technical and executive audiences.
These are the goals we design the engagement around. They are objectives, not guarantees, and the result depends on decisions and effort on your side as much as ours.
Questions
No. A vulnerability assessment identifies and verifies weaknesses; a penetration test attempts to exploit them and chain access. If you need the latter, say so and we will tell you honestly whether we are the right firm for it.
We scope to avoid it: scanning is scheduled, intrusive checks are agreed in advance, and production-sensitive systems can be tested in a window you choose. All of this goes into the written rules of engagement.
We can, and we will also be clear when your existing provider is better placed to do the remediation. The report is written to be actionable by whoever does the work.
Tell us the symptom rather than the solution. If a different service fits better — or none of ours does — we will say so.